This blog is a living journal of ideas, insights, and tools for self-transformation. You’ll find meditations, visualizations, and theories that bridge science and intuition. Personal reflections that emerge in the quiet of breath and thought. It’s a space for anyone curious about the connection between body, mind, and soul, where the creative, the reflective, and the grounded come together. Whether you're seeking emotional clarity or simply a breath of peace in a noisy world, you're welcome here
Monday, March 5, 2012
Dear Skeptic of Psychoanalysis
Psychoanalysis is not science, I agree. Is a method, and not scientific...Thank God. By the way is not a method that is needed to find lost memories, at the end of the encounter with yourself, you don't mind if you have lost few of those memories, and the one who determine if the memories are false...is the individual himself!! Could science point out a true memory? Base in what? ...even nanotechnology research in psycho neurological findings, shows memories readings can change in seconds if you introduce a doubt in the subject of study!!... Men false or true memory is scientifically impossible...yet to prove. I find your categorization and statements of Psychoanalysis very subjective and unscientific itself. The correspondence between Einstein and Freud would help you better to be less bitter towards Psychoanalysis and get a more gentle approach. Very interesting stuff. Follow the discussion at skeptic.com
Sunday, March 4, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)